From memecoins to big-name integrations, Solana faces an emerging identity test.
In the early 2020s, Solana rode the crypto boom and cheap money, later becoming widely associated with memecoins. That did not stop it from emerging as one of the few networks of interest not only to speculators but also to large corporations.
ForkLog examined how a high-speed blockchain became a contender for payments infrastructure, tokenized assets, and the agent economy, demonstrating its ability to withstand a new phase of technological change.
A boom amid the pandemic
The Solana blockchain launched in 2020. Like many projects from that wave, it came to market promising high throughput and speed. Rapid success amid the pandemic and unprecedented monetary stimulus helped the network become popular and highly liquid.
The stars aligned: abundant cheap capital, a surge of new users during lockdowns, and an industry growing at breakneck speed. The team shipped a strong product with a fast-growing ecosystem. There were problems, too. The main one turned into a running meme about a blockchain that doesn’t work on weekends. It was the cost of innovation and the price of Solana’s explosive popularity at the time.
In the first two years, the network’s TVL surged, and the price of the native token SOL climbed with it.
Solana’s early history evokes the song The House Of The Rising Sun, best known in a performance by The Animals. Its protagonist is, in a way, a prophetic version of the retail speculator archetype from Solana’s early-2020s community. At the end of the song he, like Sam Bankman-Fried, regrets his sinful life and offers cautionary advice to the mothers of young, perhaps even underage, traders. ForkLog covered how brothels and casinos sprang up around innovation here and there.
A fast, convenient stack built for mobile, focused not just on technical speed but also on user perception speed, helped Solana products gain traction quickly. Speculators and retailers are prone to risk and dopamine-cortisol loops—especially when offered:
- convenient, fast applications;
- simple interaction with the base network;
- quick market feedback and a shot at outsized windfalls;
- a dynamic media environment and an active ecosystem community.
When these factors align and reinforce each other, short-term success is all but guaranteed. But what else sets Solana apart from other large, steady networks like Cardano and Ethereum?
Solana <> Ethereum
The difference between Solana and Ethereum has long moved beyond ideology—it comes down to fundamental architectural choices.
Solana was designed as a high-throughput blockchain for mass-scale workloads: in theory, the network can process about 65,000 transactions per second (TPS), and during peak demand it sustains thousands of TPS in real conditions.
On the base layer, Ethereum still handles only dozens of transactions per second. This leads to user-facing differences: on Solana, fees are usually fractions of a cent, while on Ethereum during busy periods L1 transactions can cost from a few to tens of dollars.
Solana <> Cardano
Cardano developed from the outset as an academic project focused on research, formal verification, and cautious upgrades. That approach earned it a reputation for technical rigor but slowed ecosystem growth. As a result, Cardano significantly trails peers in TVL, developer activity, and user numbers.
Against that backdrop, Solana looks like the opposite. The ecosystem grows quickly and aggressively: new projects like Pump.fun, Jupiter or Tensor go from launch to scale in a matter of months.
High user activity—both from people and automated systems—drives much larger transaction volumes and fee revenue on Solana.
On the technology side, the network leans on Rust, a complex but mature and in-demand programming language with a broad developer base. Cardano uses the more niche, academic Haskell, which complicates onboarding new engineers.
Solana managed to beat Cardano and Ethereum in the competition for liquidity and users. The key was refusing to copy the strategies and tactics of more established, stable players.
At least through the early 2020s, Solana built its own identity in the industry. Many other competitors and would-be “Ethereum killers” got stuck in their targets’ narratives and, without realizing it, killed their own new super-blockchains instead of Ethereum.
But what does that success look like from 2026? What is its nature, and what practical value did the network’s early years create?
Art projects, memecoins, and retail mania loomed large in Solana’s storytelling and narrative. At a glance, it might seem there’s nothing else behind the blockchain. Yet a closer look at the project’s partnerships and successful integrations shows that meme factories and toxic speculation were a byproduct of effective marketing inflated by cheap early-2020s money.
Socio-technical advantage
Cardano has always been elitist, which contributed to strategic mistakes and missed opportunities. The team tried to adapt to speculators’ demands, mistaking the mass market’s impulses for lasting trends, and that did not work. The academic approach could not be reconciled with speculators’ expectations.
Cardano also failed to achieve meaningful results in its core (corporate) direction. Even Charles Hoskinson’s visit to meet Donald Trump brought no outcomes: he gladly receives guests and their generous gifts, but that does not guarantee patronage. A disappointed Hoskinson had no choice but to criticize the esteemed president.
Turning to Ethereum, the corporate results of “ultrasound money” are strong, thanks largely to its 2015 launch and a systematic approach to development and growth. Its real partnerships and integrations include names that speak for themselves, from IBM and Microsoft to international financial institutions.
By the time Solana arrived, Ethereum was already too big to be toppled by new heroes of the digital revolution. Among multifunctional networks it claimed a well-earned preeminent position. The project benefited from the early-2020s macro backdrop, while numerous L2 solutions and new users pumped liquidity into the base chain. Even the transition from PoW to PoS was successfully sold and executed relatively smoothly.
But as the helicopter money faded, user and metacapitalist loyalty waned—for many of them, unlike Ethereum’s talented founder, nothing matters beyond profit.
Socially and in communications, Ethereum is far stronger than Cardano, and its community differs from Solana’s. Technically, however, the network managed to differentiate itself along a range of parameters. In its first two years, Solana underwent massive stress tests that overloaded the network and exposed security risks around the clock.
Big names and serious money
Solana has confirmed integrations with corporates in payments infrastructure, cloud computing, telecom, and asset management. The team learned not just to sign memorandums, but to integrate into the operations of highly regulated, financially significant companies. Major players choose this blockchain not for marketing or storytelling, but for its technology and optimized transaction economics.
In September 2023, Visa announced it was expanding its USDC settlement pilot with acquirer partners over the Solana blockchain, in addition to Ethereum already connected at the time. By 2025, the company issued a release about the official integration. Another example is the Solana Pay plugin for Shopify.
Big Tech also moved quickly. In 2023, Google Cloud became a network validator and added Solana data to its BigQuery analytics product for developers. In 2026, that integration saw an expansion into the agent economy via Pay.sh, built on Coinbase’s x402 protocol, which lets agents request sources and pay per call without creating an account or paying a subscription.
In 2025, Franklin Templeton added Solana support (the project became the eighth blockchain added to the fund’s infrastructure) to its tokenized fund FOBXX. The fund later broadened its focus on the project, and it was included among ETF filings alongside bitcoin and ether.
In 2024, PayPal launched the PYUSD stablecoin on Solana in addition to Ethereum, citing speed and transaction costs—metrics where Solana clearly outpaces Ethereum.
These integrations are among the most notable and clearly illustrate the project’s real-world progress beyond marketing noise and speculation.
Over six years, Solana differentiated itself from “Ethereum killers” with an alternative network architecture—and, by a wide margin, surpassed Cardano socially and strategically. By 2026, however, Solana faces not a technological challenge but a conceptual one.
The network solved for speed, scale, and liquidity, but now encounters an identity crisis—the same phase Ethereum and Cardano have navigated in recent years.
The issue is less about technology than narrative. In crypto, narrative shapes how a project is perceived, drives capital flows, influences regulators, and underpins long-term ecosystem resilience. Here, the project faces three problems.
First, Solana has become infrastructure for major market participants and a locus for highly speculative activity at the same time. Corporate projects, payments rails, institutional integrations, and a vast segment of memecoins, art tokens, and overtly toxic schemes coexist on one network. This includes not only high-risk assets, but also projects directly associated with manipulation, wash trading, and fraud.
Second, can the network preserve unified liquidity and an open architecture without turning into an environment dominated by speculative chaos? This is especially sensitive for Solana, whose ecosystem historically embraced a single space without fragmenting users and capital.
Third, reputational pressure is mounting. The more actively the network is used by corporations, funds, and regulated companies, the sharper the questions around compliance with AML requirements and the overall “cleanliness” of the ecosystem. For institutions, it is critical to know whether they can operate in a network where legitimate products sit alongside schemes that generate artificial volume and aggressive speculative models.
Against this backdrop, Solana is approaching the most difficult stage of its development: defining its identity. What is the network in the long run— a general-purpose blockchain for everything, a high-performance corporate infrastructure, or a decentralized trading venue with minimal restrictions?
These models fit together poorly, and trying to hold them all at once inevitably creates internal contradictions. Scandals around tokens like TRUMP merely made the issue visible to a wider audience, but the contradictions emerged much earlier.
Despite its achievements, Solana remains not only “good for anything”—it is also a strong ecosystem for opaque, high-risk projects.
Can the network adapt in the next cycle for the age of artificial intelligence amid less favorable macro conditions? A serious opportunity for Solana and crypto at large is the machine economy and integration into networked autonomous AI systems. The project is positioned for this thanks to its technical parameters and corporate partnerships.
Socially, the community is no longer as active or homogeneous as in the early 2020s. But highly efficient machines and algorithms have long since replaced many traders. The same shift is happening in non-trading use cases.
Next-generation AI systems will gain greater autonomy, creating significant growth potential for many blockchains, including Solana.
As the overview of corporate integrations shows, Solana has proven utility beyond the crypto sandbox. Successful integrations with payment giants, Big Tech, and other players provide a foundation for scaling the ecosystem.
Across digital finance—steadily transforming into a true digital economy—Solana stands out as one of the projects challenging the defeatist line that “crypto is over.”
Thanks to the Pay.sh integration and its compatibility with x402, it is among the few blockchains ready to unlock the agent economy—a hyper-trend rapidly forming at the intersection of digital finance, AI, and distributed computing.
Found a mistake in the text? Select it and press CTRL+ENTER
Source: Original Article
